In an announcement that has sent murmurs through the college-basketball world, Gonzaga head coach Mark Few has opened up in unusually candid fashion about his future — and in doing so, he has cast a spotlight on one of the sport’s most volatile issues: the transfer portal. His remarks are surprising for several reasons: the clarity with which he addressed retirement, the authority with which he weighed in on structural reform, and the way his comments dovetail with those of another heavyweight, John Calipari.
—
1. The Unexpected Retirement Hint
Few, 62, has helmed the Gonzaga Bulldogs program for decades, transforming a once mid-major underdog into a perennial national contender. It wasn’t widely expected that he would discuss stepping away so soon or so openly. But in a recent interview on the Inside College Basketball podcast, he acknowledged that while he hasn’t set a firm “last game,” he is clear about one thing: when he no longer feels capable of keeping Gonzaga at the elite level, he’ll walk away.
In his words:
> “That’s kind of my total focus — to keep this [college] at that level. If we can’t do that anymore, I’m out of here. You’ll catch me on a river somewhere, fly fishing, or visiting you to come watch the US Open in September.”
His desire to spend more time with family, pursue personal interests like fishing, and embrace a life outside the daily grind of coaching underscores just how taxing the modern role has become. From recruiting to scheduling to NIL headaches, Few made it clear that the job’s demands have changed drastically.
So while he didn’t give a date, the message is clear: Few is positioning the next phase of his life — and wants to exit on his own terms.
—
2. Why the Timing Matters
It’s a telling moment for college basketball. Few’s revelation comes amid sweeping shifts in the sport: NIL deals, ever-expanding transfer activity, evolving paths to the NBA, conference realignment, and fan discontent with constant roster turnaround. Few’s reference to his “massive, time-consuming effort” managing recruiting, NIL, player retention, scheduling, and service to alumni signals that the era of “business-as-usual” coaching may be nearing an inflection point.
For Gonzaga — a program built on stability, continuity, and player development — the idea of Few handing over the reins is seismic. Many programs brace for uncertainty when a long-time coach departs; Few’s comment invites speculation about succession, identity, and the future of the “Zag” brand.
—
3. Few’s Bold Stance on the Transfer Portal
Even more striking than his retirement hint is Few’s positioning on reforming the transfer-portal system. Though he’s mastered working within the system, he is now advocating for constraints. In his interview, he echoed the sentiments of coaches like John Calipari and Tom Izzo — suggesting that the sport is out of balance.
Highlights of his reform proposal:
“You should get one transfer, and you don’t have to sit that first [year]. Anything after that, no matter what happens, you need to sit a year.”
He pointed to the benefit of a redshirt year for maturation, development and graduation:
> “Way more important than that, it puts you in great shape for graduation… I don’t know anyone with any sense of college athletics who would be against that.”
Few’s logic: one “free” transfer without penalty preserves flexibility and student-athlete rights; further moves impose consequence and encourage commitment. He argues that the current free-for-all undermines program continuity, athlete development and academic success.
—
4. Why His Endorsement Matters
Few’s endorsement of Calipari’s model amplifies the significance of the reform push. Calipari has publicly voiced his concerns about the transfer era becoming “transactional” rather than transformational. Few aligning with that viewpoint sends a unified signal from some of the sport’s most respected voices.
For many athletic directors, conference commissioners and the NCAA, hearing coaches of Few’s stature pushing for change may shift the conversation from “if” to “when.” Few isn’t just offering commentary — he’s staking his legacy on the health of college basketball and the belief that unchecked transfer mobility is eroding something vital.
—
5. The Broader Impacts on College Basketball
(a) Player Development and Stability
Few’s program at Gonzaga has long emphasized development: he often brought in transfers who sat out a year and then contributed significantly. His comment highlights the value of that “buffer” year. In a world where athletes hop program to program, Few sees loss of continuity, diminished mentorship, and fewer graduation completions.
(b) Competitive Balance
If a handful of programs constantly reload via the portal, it may undermine parity. Coaching staffs must re-recruit every offseason, team chemistry suffers, and tradition becomes harder to cement. Few suggests reform could restore some equilibrium.
(c) Fan Engagement and Identity
Fans crave connection to players and coaches; when rosters turnover yearly, that link frays. Few’s stance implies a concern about the long-term brand value of programs and whether college basketball is becoming more like a business transaction than a developmental path.
(d) Academic & Athlete Welfare
Few emphasizes graduation and finishing degrees. By limiting transfers, there’s more incentive for athletes to stay the course, engage with their institution, and finish their education. The “sit-out” year becomes not punishment but an opportunity for growth.
(e) Coaching Profession
By raising the retirement flag, Few signals that the demands on modern coaches are intensifying. The portal, NIL, recruiting arms race, social media and constant roster churn add stress. If reform doesn’t happen, some coaches may exit early, further destabilizing programs.
—
6. Criticisms and Push-Back Potential
Of course, Few’s proposals will draw push-back. Some likely objections:
Student-athlete rights: many athletes argue for maximal freedom — why should their mobility be limited? Any “sit-out” rule could be viewed as restricting their agency.
Competitive disadvantage: programs that rely on roster turnover might argue they need the ability to adjust quickly, particularly after coaching changes or player opt-outs.
Enforcement and complexity: implementing a one-transfer-free, then penalty rule would create administrative burdens and could produce unintended consequences (legal challenges, exploitation of loopholes).
Different realities for different sports: basketball’s high-mobility model isn’t equivalent to others; a blanket rule might not account for sport- or position-specific nuance.
Few, however, seems aware of these challenges and frames his proposal as a balancing mechanism rather than a full rollback of athlete rights.
—
7. What It Suggests for Gonzaga’s Near Future
For Gonzaga, Few’s comments raise several strategic questions:
Succession planning: Who will follow Few? Will the next coach embrace the same development-heavy, multi-year roster model or adapt to portal realities?
Recruiting pitch: Will Gonzaga continue to sell the “sit-out year as growth year” model? Or adapt to more immediate-eligibility transfers?
Fan messaging: The program may need to reassure stakeholders that stability remains even if the head coach steps aside.
Institutional positioning: Few’s public stance aligns Gonzaga as a thought-leader in reform; that could deepen partnerships, but also bring scrutiny if the Bulldogs deviate from the “ideal” model he advances.
—
8. Conclusion: A Legacy-Moment and a Turning-Point
In the same week that Mark Few hinted at retirement, he also doubled-down on reform for the transfer portal. That combination is rare: rarely does a coach so immersed in the current system publicly acknowledge stepping away and call for systemic change.
Few’s legacy is secure — national championships, conference titles, a transformation of the Gonzaga program — but what he’s attempting now feels like a broader legacy play: not just what he achieved at Gonzaga, but what he hopes college basketball can become. If his push helps recalibrate the sport toward stability, development and academic completion, then Few’s influence will reach beyond Spokane and into the future of the game itself.
In short: we’re witnessing not just the twilight of a legendary coach’s career, but what may become a pivotal moment for the sport’s structure and culture.
